|
From Yahoo Image Search: "Opposing Views"  opposingviews.com unknown ue, 18 Aug 2009 18:15:52 GM By . Opposing Views. Editorial Staff - To Protect and Serve . Opposing Views. This might qualify as one of the strangest stories you've read in a while. It turns out virtually ... opposingviews.com unknown Fri, 07 Aug 2009 05:48:57 GM Opposing Views. Editorial Staff on entertainment, media, headlines.  delhiplanet.com theagsmblogger Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:59:19 GM Spread the NO, ask other people in the team and who are a part of the decision making process whether they find the arguments of people with the . opposing view. better. If so they should be allowed to change their stance. ... From Google Blog Search: "Opposing Views"  news.google.com Newsday Here are some views to start your day. Newsday is pleased that untreated sewage will no longer flow into waters near Zach's Bay beach. ... news.google.com Yuma Sun To quote Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and her side kick Steny Hoyer from their USA Today's op-ed column: "Drowning out opposing views is simply ... news.google.com Cougfan.com (subscription) WSU's ability to pressure opposing quarterbacks also could get a lift from true freshman Travis Long. The athletic defensive end out of Gonzaga Prep in ... and more » From Google News Search: "Opposing Views" Is Obama's plan of eliminating opposing views supported by the populous ? Q. Does the removal of conservative programming outweigh the loss of freedom of speech rights because it allows the party to achieve their goals ? Or should we protect our rights even if it allows opposing views to be aired ? Obama's staff was talking today on CSPAN about elimintating the opposition . Its obvious their brainwashing now controls 98 % of the media , but is it absolutely necessary to destroy the remaining 2 % that is left on AM radio . Do you suppose they will allow internet broadcasts ? Yes , its obvious that the Democratic party is the party of Ignorance , KKK , segregation and hatred , but that is another topic. Democratic voters are much less independent . Maybe their insecurity and need of assurance that no one will… [cont.] Asked by SOUTH LAKE - Thu Feb 5 22:24:42 2009 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments A. I hope not. If it is then the fascist Deomcrats have won and the Republic is over. The current view by mnay Libs of freedom of speech must have Voltaire crying in the afterlife Answered by cincinnatus - Thu Feb 5 22:28:54 2009 What has your candidate done to promote compromise between opposing views? Q. Please explain how your candidate has either tried or succeeded in promoting a compromise between the different parties. We all know that candidates usually act differently when running for office, so examples of what they did BEFORE they started running for President would be great. Details and links would be appreciated. How has your candidate been successful in this area? Here's a chance to promote your candidate's successes. I'm interested in hearing from you specific details about YOUR candidate---not about whoever is opposing your candidate. Asked by Witchy - Fri Oct 31 09:26:14 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments A. nothing Answered by zwartschaap - Fri Oct 31 09:33:45 2008 Could you vote for someone with opposing views?
Q. I'm trying for a relative light subject. But suppose a presidential candidate wanted to bring back Prohibition and you like beer or wine. Forget it was tried and failed before. But suppose the candidate was intelligent, honorable and did have valid reasons for Prohibition. Could or would you vote for them? Would you be willing to give up something you like for the betterment of society and your country? And remember the subject of Prohibition purely a hypothetical situation. The benefit of which would be fewer drunk drivers, less domestic violence, fewer people needing liver transplants. Thanks on several responses. Though I didn't ask directly in the question, much was about you actually being willing to give something up personally you… [cont.] Asked by genghis1947 - Mon Oct 22 23:41:09 2007 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments A. Interesting. Well, it all depends on the subject, its importance and the arguments being made for and against it. You describe a person wanting something for themselves while knowing that it harms "society and your country." I guess sometimes people vote baldly for their own personal gain and don't care about the impact on others at all, but I'd like to think that, more often, that's not the case. People give up things they like -- stealing whatever they want when they want, for example, or stopping at red lights and driving at the speed limit -- in order to live in society as a matter of course. If, to take your example, you happen to like beer and wine but you realize that those things harm society and you see the candidate as having… [cont.] Answered by TaDa - Tue Oct 23 00:05:42 2007 From Yahoo Answer Search: "Opposing Views" |
